Civ Wars 2

Civ Wars 2

由 tjcarlos
回報問題
檢舉遊戲
Loading ad...

Civ Wars 2

評分:
3.6
上架時間: March 06, 2014
最後更新: March 06, 2014
開發者: tjcarlos

Civ Wars 2 的標籤

遊戲介紹

綁架異國公主!學習法術與技能!征服巨型怪物!創造你的傳奇!備受期待的即時策略/角色扮演遊戲續作。故事將在「Civ Wars 3」繼續,通關本作後可遊玩。你這位邪惡巫師閒暇時,突然聽到天上來的聲音,說你需要繼承人,而要培養繼承人就得綁架異國公主。於是你帶領軍隊,橫掃敵陣,展開傳奇征途。你的「Civ Wars 2」傳奇就此展開。戰鬥、學習法術與技能、征服巨型怪物!綁架異國公主!創造你的傳奇!

遊玩說明

操作方式:滑鼠進行所有操作。滑鼠/鍵盤(1-0)施放法術。點住你的建築選取,持續按住滑鼠移到你想攻擊的建築上再放開。要選多棟建築,點住、拖曳最多 15 棟,然後放開在你想攻擊的建築上。

留言

0/1000
eckduckit avatar

eckduckit

Mar. 07, 2014

265
9

"Choose yuor hero! By choose I mean use this one!" Were you drunk?

eomon avatar

eomon

Mar. 14, 2014

158
5

This must be the wrong game you uploaded right??? I mean you must have had better ai and a more complex version with more heroes and had this lying around to test graphics but posted this one by mistake....

Sir_Richie avatar

Sir_Richie

Mar. 07, 2014

216
8

I was really liked the first game, so I was excited when I saw this. Sadly, it is a huge disappointment and I am sorry to say this.
There is virtually no improvement over / additions to the first game. Skills are slightly restructured (more like: simplified), every level feels like the same, your soldiers are way more powerful than the enemy's, making stages incredibly easy, even on hard mode, the constant ambushes are really annoying as they don't add any strategic depth to the game, they just slow it down, quests are pointless too, as you go through stages and automatically complete them by winning stages

eomon avatar

eomon

Mar. 23, 2014

114
4

If you look at the Credits Leliuc, constantin and suman all quit the programming team.... Yet all the graphics people from the last game and 4 new graphic people joined.... The only programmer from the last game is Alexander... I bet the old programmers quit because they where hiring graphic designers rather then much needed programmers

Athorivos avatar

Athorivos

Apr. 21, 2014

79
3

i will continue to play the game to see if it improves at the last stages. Guys seriously, RE-make the game. the general idea is good, the execution is not. I dont say i could do it better, i say that you could do it better !!