){kind=icon}
In Between: Minimalist Target Game
由 cerivitos
Add to your home screen for quick access
Install this game
Tap the Share button, then "Add to Home Screen" to install this game for quick access.
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
In Between: Minimalist Target Game
In Between: Minimalist Target Game 的標籤
遊戲介紹
2017年11月15日更新： 新增無盡模式——一開始簡單，隨著進度越來越難！極簡硬核目標遊戲，目標很簡單——讓條形停在目標範圍內。擊中中心可獲得「靶心」分數！連續成功可提升分數倍率，一失誤倍率歸零！
無盡模式： 目標範圍較大，讓你慢慢適應！
街機模式： 每5回合隨機出現一種效果，可能幫助也可能阻礙。
經典模式： 條形會隨偏離目標的距離縮短。
Android版請見「Play商店」：https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.chanwaikit.inbetweengame&utm_source=kongregate
遊玩說明
當條形進入目標範圍時按下滑鼠鍵
開發者更新
Update 15 Nov ’17:
Endless Mode added – starts off easy to introduce you to the game but gets harder as you progress!
留言
)
Rogerup
Dec. 19, 2017
Excellent game.
)
CoolCrunch
Feb. 17, 2018
Great game, surprisingly intriguing considering the simplicity. Only thing, can you increase the time before the bar starts moving? Sometimes when the number is low (say 20-30) I have already passed the range. Great game though!
){kind=avatar}
MrStahlfelge
Dec. 27, 2017
Liked it, I think the difficulty is okay at the beginning.
Perhaps you could make it more gracefully when the player failed very tight, go on but without giving a point or something like that.
)
brokeman11
Nov. 11, 2017
I know you state up front that it's a hardcore game, but could really do with a easy/casual mode where the interval starts out fairly wide and shortens as the player progresses, giving the player a chance to get better with their approximations. As it stands, if you're no good at this sort of thing *raises hand*, it'll all seem like luck if you do well.
){kind=icon}
Thanks for playing. I see what you mean, I tried putting a guide during the first round for the player to calibrate but starting with a wider range makes sense too. Will look to implement. BTW you got 80+ which is not bad :)
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=tracking}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}
){kind=icon}