Malazar's Comments

Horribly optimised resulting in huge lag. Gets progressively worse, presumably due to memory leaks.

I have to agree with the comments that the AI could use work. the target selection seems odd - they'd rather run into a wall for half the level trying to get to a turtle that's miles away then two others are sat right next to them. This wouldn't be as frustrating if they were able to path find around the walls, however.

Too much dialogue. I found myself getting very bored reading through it all. Even after doing so, some instructions were still lacking. Digging needs to take less button spamming - holding the key should make it repeat. Also, as pointed out several times, this is a free-game site. Developers get donations for good games, but they don't charge a fee.

The resource system isn't that great, the hard AI's ability to constantly kill your resources while also having a huge advantage makes it extremly frustrating. No real change from the first game in gameplay, building is still king, and attacking a long way in second place. Why pound on your opponents wall uselessly when building a wall (which can be done with any resource) gives you a higher HP/cost ratio than attacking - attacks generally cost the same or more resources than the damage they do, but walls are always cheaper than the benefit they grant. Once your opponent has a decent wall, why attack it? simply build your castle to 100% and win.

Collision detection is extremely buggy - you only have to be vaguely close to something to have "hit" it and be sent back to the start. Retro-Platformer style is awesome, but poor execution means I've rated this with a mere 1 star. If the collisions were better, then I'd likely rate this much higher.

nice fun little game, only problem being one of the levels - third from last, i think, you can get the "full belly" level complete thing in one drop, however, you get stuck and can't actually complete the level. I had three attempts on that level trying to get a worse score :P